







Our placements stick. Nearly all clients keep their developers beyond the first year, proving the quality of our matches.
Work with developers in timezones within 0-3 hours of US hours. No more waiting overnight for responses on critical model issues.
Hire senior NLP engineers at 40-60% less than US rates without sacrificing quality or experience level.
Only 3 out of every 100 applicants make it through our vetting process. You get developers who've already proven themselves building production NLP systems.
We match you with qualified NLP developers in 4 days on average, not the 42+ days typical with traditional recruiting firms.
.avif)




NLP developers command premium rates in US markets due to specialized language processing expertise. Location changes your total hiring investment significantly. US full-time hires carry overhead beyond base salary: health benefits, payroll taxes, recruiting fees, and administrative costs.
Senior NLP developers in major US tech hubs run $165K-$225K base. The all-in cost is substantially higher.
Total hidden costs: $74.2K-$100.6K per developer
Adding base compensation brings total annual investment to $239.2K-$325.6K per NLP developer.
All-inclusive rate: $98K-$133K
This covers compensation, local benefits, payroll taxes, PTO, HR administration, recruiting, technical vetting, legal compliance, and performance management. No hidden fees, no agency markup, no administrative burden. Your NLP developer joins your Slack, attends standups, and ships text processing features while you focus on product strategy.
US total cost for a senior NLP developer runs $239.2K-$325.6K annually when factoring in all overhead. Tecla's all-inclusive rate: $98K-$133K. You save $106.2K-$192.6K per developer (44-59% reduction).
A team of 5 NLP developers costs $1.2M-$1.6M annually in the US. Through Tecla: $490K-$665K. Annual savings: $706K-$961K. Same technical capability with transformers and language models, English fluency for architecture discussions, timezone alignment for real-time debugging.
Resources can be replaced at no cost during the 90-day trial. No recruiting fees or placement costs. Transparent all-inclusive pricing from month one.
NLP developers build systems that understand, process, and generate human language. They create text classification models, entity extraction systems, sentiment analysis tools, and language understanding features. They architect solutions that balance accuracy with performance and cost.
NLP developers sit between data science and software engineering. They're not pure researchers, but they understand language models well enough to build reliable production systems. Most work involves model selection, fine-tuning, pipeline design, and integrating NLP into applications.
They differentiate from general ML engineers through deep knowledge of language-specific challenges like ambiguity, context, and multilingual processing. Unlike researchers, they ship customer-facing features instead of publishing papers.
Companies hire NLP developers when moving beyond keyword search into language understanding. This happens after deciding NLP features make business sense but before knowing how to make them accurate, fast, and maintainable for production use.
When you hire an NLP developer, text processing stops being manual work and starts being automated. Most companies see faster document processing and better insights from unstructured data.
Automation at Scale: Text classification and entity extraction that processes thousands of documents daily. Tasks that took humans hours now finish in seconds with consistent accuracy.
Better User Experience: Search that understands intent instead of just matching keywords. Content recommendations based on semantic similarity. Features that feel intelligent because they actually understand language.
Data Insights: Sentiment analysis across customer feedback. Topic modeling that surfaces trends. Information extraction that turns unstructured text into structured data for analysis.
Your job description filters for NLP engineers who've built production language models, not just completed courses. Make it specific enough to attract people who've debugged model accuracy issues in production.
State whether you need someone to build text classification, entity extraction, question answering, or own your NLP strategy. Include what success looks like: "Building a classifier with 90%+ F1 score on production data" beats "working with text."
Give context about your data, languages, and what's not working. Are your current models underperforming on domain-specific text? Do you need multilingual support? Help candidates understand if this matches problems they've solved.
List 3-5 must-haves that truly disqualify. "Built production NLP models processing 10K+ documents daily" is specific. "Experience with text" is worthless. Include years with frameworks (spaCy, Transformers, BERT) and outcomes (improved accuracy, faster processing).
Separate required from preferred so strong candidates don't rule themselves out. Experience with specific transformer architectures might be nice, but if someone's shipped reliable NLP features and can learn new models, don't lose them.
Tell candidates to send a brief description of the most complex NLP system they built and what accuracy challenges they faced. This filters for people who've shipped real models.
Set timeline expectations: "We'll respond within 5 business days and schedule first interviews within 2 weeks" beats radio silence.
Good questions reveal how candidates think about model selection, evaluation, and production deployment. Not surface-level knowledge.
What it reveals: Understanding of classification approaches, data requirements, and common NLP challenges. Listen for specific decisions about model architecture, handling class imbalance, evaluation metrics.
What it reveals: Hands-on debugging beyond "retrain the model." Look for discussion of analyzing error patterns, identifying data drift, testing domain adaptation, measuring improvement properly.
What it reveals: Whether they own outcomes or execute tasks. Listen for ownership of metrics like precision, recall, F1 score, latency. Strong candidates explain error analysis and model iterations.
What it reveals: How they debug complex systems and learn from failures. Look for honesty about what went wrong, specific debugging techniques, and improvements made.
What it reveals: Strategic thinking about limited data scenarios. Watch for discussion of transfer learning, data augmentation, few-shot approaches, when to use pre-trained models.
What it reveals: Collaborative problem-solving and communication style. Listen for partnership mindset, not gatekeeping. Strong candidates educate stakeholders about realistic expectations.
What it reveals: Honest self-assessment about what energizes them. Neither answer is wrong, but helps identify mismatches. Strong candidates know what they're good at and what drains them.
