







We match you with qualified Snowflake developers in 5 days on average, not the 42+ days typical with traditional recruiting firms.
Only 3 out of every 100 applicants make it through our vetting process. You get developers who've already proven themselves with production Snowflake warehouses.
Hire Snowflake engineers at 40-60% less than US rates without sacrificing quality or experience level.
Our placements stick. Nearly all clients keep their developers beyond the first year, proving the quality of our matches.
Work with developers in timezones within 0-3 hours of US hours. No more waiting overnight for responses or debugging query issues solo.





A Snowflake developer builds and maintains data warehouses using Snowflake's cloud platform. Think of them as data engineers who specialize in organizing company data so analysts and data scientists can actually use it, not infrastructure engineers managing servers.
The difference from general data engineers? Snowflake developers know the specific features that make Snowflake powerful. They understand virtual warehouses, zero-copy cloning, time travel, data sharing, and how to structure data for fast queries without burning money.
These folks sit at the intersection of data engineering, analytics engineering, and database administration. They're not just loading data, they're designing warehouse structures that make sense, writing efficient SQL, and keeping costs reasonable as data grows.
Companies hire Snowflake developers when they're migrating from legacy warehouses, scaling analytics infrastructure, or drowning in slow queries and confusing data models. The role grew as more companies realized cloud data warehouses beat maintaining their own databases.
When you hire Snowflake developers, you get data infrastructure that actually supports business decisions. Most companies see query performance improve 5-10x, monthly costs drop 30-50% through optimization, and analysts who can finally self-serve without constant engineering support.
Here's where the ROI becomes obvious. Migrating from an on-premise Oracle warehouse? A Snowflake specialist handles that without losing data or breaking existing reports. Your monthly Snowflake bill keeps climbing and nobody knows why? They identify expensive queries, right-size warehouses, and implement proper clustering.
Analysts complaining they can't find the data they need? Good Snowflake developers design clear data models with proper documentation. Dashboards taking forever to load? They optimize queries, add materialized views, and implement result caching.
Real-time reporting requires streaming data ingestion. Snowflake developers build Snowpipe integrations that load data continuously instead of nightly batch jobs. Your competitors analyze yesterday's data while you're working with the current hour.
Your job description filters candidates. Make it specific enough to attract qualified Snowflake developers and scare off people who just passed a certification exam.
"Senior Snowflake Engineer" beats "Data Wizard" every time. Be searchable. Include seniority level since someone with 2 years SQL experience can't architect an enterprise data warehouse yet.
Give real context. Your stage (seed, Series B, public). Your product (e-commerce analytics, financial reporting, healthcare data). Team size (3-person data team vs. 30+ engineers). Current state (migrating from Redshift, scaling existing Snowflake, building from scratch).
Candidates decide if they want your environment. Help them self-select by being honest about what you're building.
Skip buzzwords. Describe actual work:
Separate must-haves from nice-to-haves. "3+ years building production Snowflake warehouses" means more than "data warehouse experience." Your tools matter, dbt, Fivetran, Looker, Tableau.
Be honest about what you actually need. Data modeling expertise? Query optimization? Pipeline development? Cost management? Say so upfront.
"5+ years data engineering, 2+ years specifically with Snowflake production environments" sets clear expectations. Many strong developers came from Oracle, SQL Server, or Redshift backgrounds. Focus on what they've shipped.
How does your team work? Fully remote with async communication? Role requires explaining data models to non-technical stakeholders? Team values documentation and knowledge sharing?
Skip "team player" and "excellent communication", everyone claims those. Be specific about your actual environment.
"Send resume plus 3-4 sentences about a Snowflake warehouse you designed and what challenges you solved" filters better than generic applications. Set timeline expectations: "We review weekly and schedule calls within 3 days."
Strong candidates explain separation of storage and compute, virtual warehouses that scale independently, and how this enables zero-copy cloning and data sharing. They connect it to real scenarios, running ETL jobs without impacting analyst queries.
Design a data warehouse for a retail company with sales, inventory, and customer data. Walk me through your approach.
This reveals understanding of dimensional modeling. They should discuss fact tables (sales transactions), dimension tables (products, customers, stores), slowly changing dimensions, and grain decisions. Listen for practical considerations like query patterns and update frequency.
Practical candidates check query history for expensive queries, warehouse usage patterns, and credit consumption by user or warehouse. They mention automatic clustering costs, data storage growth, and long-running queries. This shows cost management thinking.
Strong answers investigate what changed, data volume growth, schema changes, new joins. Then optimize: add clustering keys, create materialized views, or restructure the underlying data model. Avoid candidates who immediately suggest "just use a bigger warehouse."
Their definition of success matters. Query performance? Analyst satisfaction? Cost efficiency? Strong candidates explain data modeling decisions, how they handled slowly changing dimensions, and what they learned from production usage.
Experienced developers acknowledge each has strengths. Snowflake excels at SQL analytics with easy scaling. Databricks wins for complex data science workflows. BigQuery offers simpler pricing for Google Cloud shops. This reveals understanding of trade-offs.
Good answers: create clear views that hide complexity, document data models with business definitions, provide example queries, and hold regular office hours. They enable self-service instead of becoming a bottleneck.
What do they focus on? Understanding the actual question behind the request? Clarifying grain and dimensions? Setting expectations on refresh frequency? Good answers mention iterative development and confirming the output meets needs. Listen for collaborative approach.
Neither answer is wrong. But if you're scaling a production warehouse and they only want greenfield work, that's a mismatch. Watch for self-awareness about preferences.
Strong candidates discuss starting with simpler models that work, adding complexity as needs emerge, and when technical debt becomes worth paying down. Avoid candidates who insist on perfect models upfront or never refactor bad designs.
Location changes your budget dramatically without affecting technical ability.
A team of 5 mid-level Snowflake developers costs $625K-$875K annually in the US versus $275K-$400K from LATAM. That's $350K-$475K saved annually while getting the same technical skills, full timezone overlap, and fluent English.
These LATAM developers join your standups, debug query issues in real-time, and work your hours. The savings reflect regional cost differences, not compromised quality.
