





We match you with qualified Databricks developers in 5 days on average, not the 42+ days typical with traditional recruiting firms.
99% of our developers respond within business hours. They work when you work, making collaboration seamless.
Access senior Databricks engineers at 40-60% below US market rates while maintaining the same quality and expertise.
Our developers stay long-term. Almost every client extends their engagement past the first year, demonstrating the quality of our talent matches.
Work with developers in timezones within 0-3 hours of US hours. No more waiting overnight for responses or debugging production issues solo.





A Databricks developer builds data pipelines and lakehouse architectures using the Databricks platform. Think of them as data engineers who specialize in making Apache Spark, Delta Lake, and cloud infrastructure work together at scale.
The difference from general data engineers? Databricks engineers know the specific tricks that make these systems fast and cost-efficient. They understand medallion architecture patterns, Unity Catalog governance, and how to optimize Spark jobs so your monthly bill doesn't explode.
These folks sit at the intersection of data engineering, analytics, and machine learning operations. They're not just writing ETL scripts, they're architecting platforms that serve your entire data team.
Companies hire Databricks developers when they're ditching legacy warehouses, scaling analytics infrastructure, or building modern lakehouse setups. The role took off when organizations realized flexible platforms beat rigid warehouse systems for handling messy real-world data.
When you hire Databricks developers, you get measurable improvements fast. Most companies see compute costs drop 40-60% after proper pipeline optimization. Data quality issues disappear. Analysts get answers in minutes instead of hours.
Here's where the ROI becomes obvious. Migrating from Snowflake? A Databricks specialist handles that without breaking your analytics team's workflows. Data scientists complaining that feature engineering takes forever? The right developer sets up Feature Store and automated pipelines that actually work.
Your cloud bill keeps climbing and nobody knows why? They'll fix it in weeks, eliminating unnecessary data shuffles, right-sizing clusters, and setting up proper cost controls.
Your job description filters candidates. Make it specific enough to attract qualified developers and scare off resume keyword stuffers.
"Senior Databricks Engineer" beats "Data Wizard" every time. Be searchable. Include seniority level since someone with 3 years Spark experience can't architect an enterprise lakehouse yet.
Give real context. Your stage (seed, Series B, public). Your product (fintech platform, e-commerce analytics). Team size (5-person data team vs. 50+ engineers). Tech stack (AWS-based, migrating from Snowflake, real-time streaming focus).
Candidates decide if they want your environment. Help them self-select by being honest about what you're building.
Skip buzzwords. Describe actual work:
Separate must-haves from nice-to-haves. "3+ years with PySpark" means more than "big data experience." Your cloud platform matters, AWS, Azure, and GCP implementations all differ.
Be honest about what you actually need. Streaming pipelines? Unity Catalog? ML integration? Say so upfront.
"5+ years data engineering, 2+ years Databricks production systems" sets clear expectations. Many strong developers learned by building systems, not through CS degrees. Focus on what they've shipped.
How does your team work? Fully remote with async communication? Role requires explaining architecture to non-technical stakeholders? Team values documentation?
Skip "team player" and "excellent communication", everyone claims those. Be specific about your actual environment.
"Send resume plus 3-4 sentences about your most complex Databricks project" filters better than generic applications. Set timeline expectations: "We review weekly and schedule calls within 3 days."
Strong candidates explain the _delta_log directory, ACID transactions, and optimistic concurrency control. They connect it to real scenarios,multiple pipelines updating the same table without conflicts.
Experienced developers start with Spark UI, stage timelines, shuffle sizes, task distribution. They mention data skew, unnecessary shuffles, small file problems, wrong partitioning. Watch for systematic thinking versus random guessing.
This reveals understanding of layered architecture. Bronze (raw ingestion), silver (cleaned data), gold (business-ready). They should discuss Unity Catalog organization and handling schema changes without breaking downstream users.
Practical candidates check cluster usage patterns, left running overnight, oversized configs, retry loops. They review Spark UI for expensive operations and implement cost controls. This shows operational thinking beyond making code work.
Strong answers avoid "add more memory." They investigate operations collecting data to the driver, broadcast joins that got too large, or insufficient partitioning. Understanding distributed computing fundamentals matters here.
Their definition of "complex" matters. Technical complexity? Business logic? Operational constraints? Strong candidates explain trade-offs and what they'd change knowing what they know now.
Experienced developers acknowledge both have strengths. Databricks excels at unstructured data and ML integration. Snowflake wins for SQL analytics with simple data models. This reveals trade-off thinking.
Good answers: create clear SQL views, provide example queries, set up Databricks SQL endpoints, write helpful table descriptions. They enable non-technical users instead of gatekeeping.
What do they value? Correctness? Performance? Maintainability? Cost? Good answers mention specific issues like missing error handling or inefficient joins. Listen for constructive approach.
Neither answer is wrong. But if you're migrating a legacy system and they only want greenfield work, that's a mismatch. Watch for self-awareness about preferences.
Strong candidates negotiate scope (MVP first, full solution later) and communicate trade-offs clearly (speed means debt). Avoid candidates who always cave or never compromise.
Location changes your budget dramatically without affecting technical ability.
A team of 5 mid-level Databricks developers costs $650K-$900K annually in the US versus $275K-$400K from LATAM. That's $375K-$500K saved annually while getting the same technical skills, full timezone overlap, and fluent English.
These LATAM databricks developers join your standups, debug production issues in real-time, and work your hours. The savings reflect regional cost differences, not compromised quality.
